Segment
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. ?
Comparison: Nokian WR D4 vs.
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than (48%). The first tyre test of Nokian WR D4 was done in 2015, compared to when was the first tested. We also know where WR D4 is made - Finland.
| # | Nokian WR D4 | Add to comparison | |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
1. 12920
Number of tests
Best position in test
1. ?
Worst position in test
1. ?2. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
1. ?2. Nokian WR D4 6.04
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. ?
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. ?
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Nokian WR D4 73%2. ?
Dry driving behavior
1. Nokian WR D4 79%2. ?
Dry handling
1. Nokian WR D4 78%2. ?
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian WR D4 77%2. ?
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian WR D4 75%2. ?
Wet braking
1. Nokian WR D4 76%2. ?
Wet handling
1. Nokian WR D4 82%2. ?
Wet circle cornering
1. Nokian WR D4 76%2. ?
Wet braking according to EU label
2. ?
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
1. Nokian WR D4 75%2. ?
Snow braking
1. Nokian WR D4 77%2. ?
Snow handling
1. Nokian WR D4 74%2. ?
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Nokian WR D4 86%2. ?
Interior noise
1. Nokian WR D4 81%2. ?
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR D4 ? dB2. ? dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel efficiency
1. Nokian WR D4 65%2. ?
Mileage
1. Nokian WR D4 85%2. ?
Rolling resistance
1. Nokian WR D4 99%2. ?
Fuel consumption according to EU label
2. ?
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
1. Nokian WR D4 65%2. ?
Ice lateral guidance
1. Nokian WR D4 68%2. ?