• 7 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Nokian WR D4 vs. Nokian WR SUV 4

Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Nokian, which is a brand from Finland. In this particular case, the Nokian WR SUV 4 has a better rating of 89% compared to 86% of the Nokian WR D4. The first tyre test of Nokian WR D4 was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Nokian WR SUV 4 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Nokian WR D4 has B wet grip rating, whereas 89% of Nokian WR SUV 4 has C rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WR D4 is made in Finland and WR SUV 4 is made in Russian Federation.

# Nokian WR D4
/86%
Nokian WR SUV 4
/89%
DimensionsR13 - R20 R16 - R21
PriceSet your car's tyre size
TypeWinter Winter
SegmentUpper-middle Upper-middle
Tested26x 5x
Best place2. 185/65 R15 ACE 20181. 235/60 R18 Offroad 2018
Worst place14. 195/65 R15 Autobild 20188. 235/55 R18 Autobild 2021
Average place6.04 4.6
Last test2018 2021
Best ratingHighly recommended 185/65 R15 Autozeitung 2015Test winner 235/60 R18 Offroad 2018
Worst ratingRecommended 215/60 R17 AutoMotorSport 2016Good 235/60 R18 Autobild 2018
Dry79.9 %86.6 %
Dry braking80.9% 84.5%
Safety73.7% 87%
Dry driving behavior71.5% -
Dry handling77.7% 84%
Dry handling - objective81.5% -
Dry lane changing90% -
Dry steering response75% 100%
Wet71.4 %67.5 %
Wet handling69.1% 76.8%
Aquaplaning - cross73.4% 35.5%
Aquaplaning - longitudal75.6% 60%
Wet braking69.8% 68.3%
Wet circle cornering72.1% 86.5%
Wet handling - objective70% -
Snow91.7 %82.9 %
Snow traction89.4% 82.8%
Snow braking90.6% 98%
Snow handling91.4% 81.8%
Snow cornering93.5% 71%
Snow handling - objective93.5% -
Costs81.2 %80.5 %
Fuel efficiency85.5% -
Wear63.5% -
Rolling resistance99.3% 80.5%
Price/value78.5% -
Mileage79% -
Comfort70.9 %68.6 %
Exterior noise68.9% 72.3%
Interior noise69% -
Comfort70.5% 65%
Noise76% -
Ice83.3 %93.2 %
Ice braking85.2% 94.5%
Ice lateral guidance81.7% -