Segment
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 3 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Nokian, which is a brand from Finland. The first tyre test of Nokian WR SUV 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof P first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 80% of Nokian WR SUV 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian WR Snowproof P has B rating.
| # | Nokian WR SUV 3
| Nokian WR Snowproof P
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 | | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB