• 8 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Nokian zLine SUV vs. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Yokohama (32%). In this particular case, the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 has a better rating of 46% compared to 32% of the Nokian zLine SUV. The first tyre test of Nokian zLine SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the zLine SUV and the Advan Fleva V701 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 also have A wet ratings.

# Nokian zLine SUV
/32%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
/46%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR17 - R22 R15 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test1-1-1
Nokian zLine SUV
Rating: Satisfactory
2-23+
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
Rating: Conditionally recommended
3+2+2
Show test details