Segment
1. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Upper-middle2. Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Maxxis). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Maxxis (21%). But when it comes to comparing BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER and Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the ACTIVAN WINTER and the Vansmart Snow WL2 were tested.
# | BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER | Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R12 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Upper-middle2. Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Lowcost
1. Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Still recommended
1. Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Still recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Rating: Not recommended | 4,9 | 3,4 | 3,1 | 2,3 | 3,3 | 2,0 | 1,7 |
Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Rating: Not recommended | 2,7 | 2,5 | 5,0 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 1,9 |
Show test details |