Segment
2. Giti GitiWinter W1 Lowcost
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO vs. Giti GitiWinter W1
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (Giti). Giti is a brand that belongs to the GT group. Generally, Giti winter tyres are slightly better rated (50%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Giti GitiWinter W1 has a better rating of 61% compared to 52% of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO. Important for this comparison is also the AutoMotorSport 2018 205/55 R16 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 EVO and the Winter W1 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO | Giti GitiWinter W1 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Giti GitiWinter W1 15.56
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Satisfactory2. Giti GitiWinter W1 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Still recommended2. Giti GitiWinter W1 Still recommended
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,1 | ||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Rating: Still recommended | 7,8 | ||||||
| Giti GitiWinter W1 Rating: Still recommended | 7,2 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,1 | 2,9 | 2,3 | 3,6 | 1,0 | 1,9 |
| Giti GitiWinter W1 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 3,6 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO | 34,3 | 29,8 | |||||
| Giti GitiWinter W1 | 38,9 | 28 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||