Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Maxxis). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (46%) than Maxxis (21%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak W810 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the Blizzak W810 and the Vansmart Snow WL2 were tested.
# | Bridgestone Blizzak W810 | Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R12 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Lowcost
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended2. Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Still recommended
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended2. Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Still recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 4,0 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,7 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Rating: Not recommended | 2,7 | 2,5 | 5,0 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 1,9 |
Show test details |