Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Premium2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Bridgestone (57%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport has a better rating of 92% compared to 67% of the Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Potenza Sport was done in 2021, compared to 2022 when was the Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 265/35 R19 test, where both the Potenza Sport and the Ventus S1 evo Z K129 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Potenza Sport dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (86%) of the Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Potenza Sport is made in Poland/Hungary and Ventus S1 evo Z K129 is made in Hungary.
# | Bridgestone Potenza Sport | Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R18 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Premium2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 Premium
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Very good
Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | 1- | |||
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2- | |||
Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2+ | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 9,3 | 7,2 | 7,2 | 6,3 | |||
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Rating: Very good | 8,2 | 9,0 | 8,0 | 6,3 | |||
Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 Rating: Good | 7,3 | 7,3 | 7,2 | 7,9 | |||
Show test details |