Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Yokohama (31%). In this particular case, the Continental PremiumContact 6 has a better rating of 87% compared to 23% of the Yokohama Bluearth AE-50. The first tyre test of Continental PremiumContact 6 was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the PremiumContact 6 and the Bluearth AE-50 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Continental PremiumContact 6 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (67%) of the Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 also have A wet ratings. We also know where PremiumContact 6 is made - Slovakia/Germany/Czech Republic.
# | Continental PremiumContact 6 | Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R14 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Test winner | 264 | 137 | 127 | ||||
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 | 199 | 77 | 122 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 277 | 142 | 135 | ||||
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: - | 277 | 142 | 135 | ||||
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 | 235 | 114 | 121 | ||||
Show test details |