Segment
1. Continental SportContact 6 Premium2. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental SportContact 6 vs. Nokian Powerproof
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Nokian (57%). In this particular case, the Continental SportContact 6 has a better rating of 85% compared to 71% of the Nokian Powerproof. The first tyre test of Continental SportContact 6 was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian Powerproof first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 93% of Continental SportContact 6 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian Powerproof also have A wet ratings.
| # | Continental SportContact 6 | Nokian Powerproof | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R23 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Continental SportContact 6 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet side guide
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry steering response
Dry lane changing
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian Powerproof 72 dB