Segment
1. Continental VanContact Winter Premium2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). In this particular case, the Continental VanContact Winter has a better rating of 75% compared to 55% of the Michelin AGILIS ALPIN. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the VanContact Winter and the AGILIS ALPIN were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Continental VanContact Winter dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin AGILIS ALPIN also have B wet ratings.
# | Continental VanContact Winter | Michelin AGILIS ALPIN | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental VanContact Winter Premium2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Recommended2. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Still recommended
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 71 dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,8 | 3,1 | 3,0 | 2,2 |
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Recommended | 2,9 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended | |||||||
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Still recommended | |||||||
Show test details |