Segment
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost2. Goodride Solmax 11 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto UHP 2 vs. Goodride Solmax 11
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Goodride). Generally, Goodride summer tyres are slightly better rated (49%) than Debica (45%). In this particular case, the Debica Presto UHP 2 has a better rating of 75% compared to 62% of the Goodride Solmax 11. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2024 215/55 R17 test, where both the Presto UHP 2 and the Solmax 11 were tested.
| # | Debica Presto UHP 2 | Goodride Solmax 11 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R19 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Goodride Solmax 11 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Goodride Solmax 11 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,7 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,6 | |||||
| Goodride Solmax 11 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 3,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||