Segment
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost2. Linglong Sport Master 2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong). Generally, Debica summer tyres are slightly better rated (45%) than Linglong (39%). In this particular case, the Debica Presto UHP 2 has a better rating of 75% compared to 62% of the Linglong Sport Master 2. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2024 215/55 R17 test, where both the Presto UHP 2 and the Sport Master 2 were tested.
# | Debica Presto UHP 2 | Linglong Sport Master 2 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R17 - R19 | ||
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost2. Linglong Sport Master 2 Lowcost
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Linglong Sport Master 2 Satisfactory
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Linglong Sport Master 2 Satisfactory
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,7 | |||||
Debica Presto UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,6 | |||||
Linglong Sport Master 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 3,5 | |||||
Show test details |