Segment
2. Debica Presto UHP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto UHP2 vs. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear summer tyres are slightly better rated (72%) than Debica (45%). In this particular case, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 has a better rating of 90% compared to 58% of the Debica Presto UHP2. The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP2 was done in 2022, compared to 2019 when was the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Debica Presto UHP2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (71%) of the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Debica Presto UHP2 | GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R18 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Exemplary2. Debica Presto UHP2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Debica Presto UHP2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Price/value
Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Debica Presto UHP2 68 dB