Segment
1. Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro Lowcost2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost
Comparison: Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Esa) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Esa winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Matador (40%). In this particular case, the Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro has a better rating of 65% compared to 43% of the Matador MP93 Nordicca. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Tecar Supergrip Pro and the MP93 Nordicca were tested.
| # | Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro | Matador MP93 Nordicca | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory2. Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory2. Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,8 | 1,4 | 1,8 | 1,5 | 2,7 | 1,5 |
| Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 3,1 | 1,9 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Matador MP93 Nordicca Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 3,4 | 2,3 | 2,0 | 2,3 | 2,9 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||