Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Upper-middle2. Imperial EcoSport SUV Lowcost
Comparison: Falken Azenis FK510 SUV vs. Imperial EcoSport SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Imperial (17%). The first tyre test of Falken Azenis FK510 SUV was done in 2020, compared to 2021 when was the Imperial EcoSport SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 235/55 R18 test, where both the Azenis FK510 SUV and the EcoSport SUV were tested. We also know where Azenis FK510 SUV is made - Japan.
| # | Falken Azenis FK510 SUV | Imperial EcoSport SUV | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R16 - R117 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Very good -
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Grass traction
Gravel traction
Mud traction
Sand traction
Handling on gravel
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Imperial EcoSport SUV Rating: Not recommended | 3- | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||