Segment
1. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Upper-middle2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Kumho PorTran CW51
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). In this particular case, the Falken EuroWinter VAN01 has a better rating of 45% compared to 40% of the Kumho PorTran CW51. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the EuroWinter VAN01 and the PorTran CW51 were tested.
| # | Falken EuroWinter VAN01 | Kumho PorTran CW51 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Conditionally recommended2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Conditionally recommended2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,3 | 3,2 | 4,0 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 2,0 | 1,8 |
| Kumho PorTran CW51 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,6 | 4,1 | 3,0 | 2,6 | 3,0 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||