Segment
2. Falken Sincera SN-832 Ecorun Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken Sincera SN-832 Ecorun vs. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Falken (59%). In this particular case, the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 has a better rating of 68% compared to 60% of the Falken Sincera SN-832 Ecorun. The first tyre test of Falken Sincera SN-832 Ecorun was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 175/65 R14 test, where both the Sincera SN-832 Ecorun and the ContiPremiumContact 5 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Falken Sincera SN-832 Ecorun has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 has B rating.
| # | Falken Sincera SN-832 Ecorun | Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R12 - R15 | R15 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Falken Sincera SN-832 Ecorun Rating: Good | 2,2 | 1,6 | 3,8 | 2,5 | 2,3 | ||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 1,9 | 1,7 | 3,5 | 3,0 | 1,9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||