• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320

Table of contents:

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Firestone (50%). In this particular case, the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 has a better rating of 51% compared to 40% of the Firestone Winterhawk 3. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Winterhawk 3 and the Winter i*cept evo2 W320 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 92% of Firestone Winterhawk 3 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (86%) of the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 also have C wet ratings.

# Firestone Winterhawk 3
/40%
 		Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
/51%

Add to comparison

New comparison
DimensionsR13 - R18 R15 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+2+11-
Firestone Winterhawk 3
Rating: Satisfactory		3+222-
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
Rating: Satisfactory		2-23+2
Show test details
ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 225/45 R17
Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test2,32,11,72,02,81,51,5
Firestone Winterhawk 3
Rating: -		3,02,92,42,0 2,8 2,02,2
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
Rating: -		3,02,22,52,43,52,52,3
Show test details