Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle2. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Lowcost
Comparison: Giti Gitiwinter W2 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (Giti) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Giti is a brand that belongs to the GT group. Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Giti (50%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR Snowproof P has a better rating of 50% compared to 44% of the Giti Gitiwinter W2. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2022 225/45 R17 test, where both the winter W2 and the WR Snowproof P were tested.
| # | Giti Gitiwinter W2 | Nokian WR Snowproof P | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Snow handling
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry lane changing
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 147 | 143 | 147 | ||||
| Giti GitiWinter W2 | 85 | 113 | 129 | ||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Recommended for economical driving | 84 | 143 | 129 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||