Segment
2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Goodyear summer tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Yokohama (31%). The first tyre test of Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 was done in 2020, compared to 2022 when was the Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Efficient Grip Performance 2 and the BLUEARTH-GT AE51 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 83% of Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (93%) of the Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 also have A wet ratings.
# | Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 | Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R14 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle
1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Exemplary2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Satisfactory2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 146 | 134 | |||||
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Rating: Highly recommended | 128 | 130 | |||||
Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Rating: Sufficient | 91 | 113 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 | 36,8 | 29,7 | |||||
Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 | 37,7 | 32,2 | |||||
Show test details |