Segment
2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has a better rating of 88% compared to 65% of the Nokian WR SUV 4. The first tyre test of GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Nokian WR SUV 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 235/55 R18 test, where both the UltraGrip Performance+ and the WR SUV 4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 82% of GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has B wet grip rating, whereas 89% of Nokian WR SUV 4 has C rating.
# | GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | Nokian WR SUV 4 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R16 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 100%
2. Nokian WR SUV 4 72 dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 2 | 1- | ||
Nokian WR SUV 4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2- | 2 | ||
Show test details |