Segment
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium2. Gt Radial Fe2 Suv Lowcost
Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 Suv vs. Vredestein ULTRAC
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (Gt) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Radial Fe2 Suv and the ULTRAC were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Gt Radial Fe2 Suv | Vredestein ULTRAC | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Gt Radial Fe2 Suv 19.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended2. Gt Radial Fe2 Suv Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Gt Radial Fe2 Suv Satisfactory2. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Gt Radial Fe2 Suv ? dB2. Vredestein ULTRAC ? dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 Suv Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 3+ | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Rating: Satisfactory | 1- | 2 | 3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 Suv | 37 | 29,7 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac | 36,1 | 28,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||