• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than BFGoodrich (40%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich Advantage has a better rating of 76% compared to 72% of the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125. The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 was done in 2016, compared to 2021 when was the BFGoodrich Advantage first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the Ventus Prime3 K125 and the Advantage were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (98%) of the BFGoodrich Advantage also have A wet ratings. We also know where Ventus Prime3 K125 is made - Hungary.

# Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
/72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
/76%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR15 - R20 R14 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test1-2+1
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Rating: Good
1- 1-3+
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Satisfactory
2-2+ 2-
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,129,6
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K12534,1 29,6
BFGoodrich Advantage36,731,9
Show test details
Name WetDryNoiseWear
Best values in test1,81,42,70,6
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Rating: Satisfactory
2,71,52,92,5
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Satisfactory
2,92,22,82,0
Show test details