Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Hankook (63%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 has a better rating of 72% compared to 68% of the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Ventus Prime3 K125 and the ContiPremiumContact 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Ventus Prime3 K125 is made in Hungary and ContiPremiumContact 5 is made in Czech Republic.
# | Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R15 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary
2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 2- | ||||
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,5 | 35,2 | |||||
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 | 36,4 | 36 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 | ||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Good | 2,5 | 1,6 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,1 | ||
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 2,2 | 3,3 | 2,5 | 1,7 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 153 | 42 | 37 | 14 | 6 | ||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Recommended | 144 | 57 | 47 | 16 | 9 | ||
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Highly recommended | 153 | 68 | 50 | 16 | 6 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 256 | 131 | 133 | ||||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 225 | 104 | 121 | ||||
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 | 249 | 131 | 118 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 0,5 | 1,5 | 1,6 | ||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Good | 3,3 | 1,8 | 2,5 | 3,0 | 2,2 | ||
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Good | 1,9 | 1,8 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 2,4 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 1- | ||||
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Exemplary | 2- | 1- | 2 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,6 | 27,9 | |||||
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 | 34,7 | 30,6 | |||||
Show test details |