Segment
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Kumho (48%). In this particular case, the Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 has a better rating of 78% compared to 61% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 225/45 R17 test, where both the W462 Winter i*cept RS3 and the WinterCraft WP52 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 | Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R13 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle
1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Highly recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,0 | |||||
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,7 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,7 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 | 35,3 | 26,6 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 3+ | |||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2- | 2 | |||
Show test details |