Segment
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium
Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 92% compared to 69% of the Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A. The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A was done in 2021, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Tyre Reviews 2023 235/60 R18 test, where both the Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 99% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A has B wet grip rating, whereas 98% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A rating.
| # | Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Highly recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
Worst rating in test
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Rating: Good | |||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 63 | 64 | 43 | 18 | 8 | ||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Rating: Recommended | 61 | 62 | 43 | 16 | 5 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended | 60 | 64 | 41 | 18 | 7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Rating: Good | 2+ | 2- | 2+ | 3+ | 2- | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 386 | 143 | 138 | 118 | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A | 327 | 83 | 128 | 116 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended | 386 | 143 | 136 | 107 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||