Segment
2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Firestone (50%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A and Firestone Winterhawk 4, the rating is the same - 69%. The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A was done in 2021, compared to 2020 when was the Firestone Winterhawk 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/60 R18 test, where both the Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A and the Winterhawk 4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 99% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Firestone Winterhawk 4 also have B wet ratings.
# | Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A | Firestone Winterhawk 4 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R14 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Upper-middle
1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Highly recommended2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Highly recommended
2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Satisfactory
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Rating: Good | |||||||
Firestone Winterhawk 4 Rating: Not recommended | |||||||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 386 | 143 | 138 | 118 | |||
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A | 327 | 83 | 128 | 116 | |||
Firestone Winterhawk 4 Rating: Highly recommended | 363 | 125 | 123 | 115 | |||
Show test details |