Segment
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 Premium2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Kumho (48%). In this particular case, the Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 has a better rating of 61% compared to 47% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP51. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2015 185/60 R15 test, where both the Winter i*cept RS W442 and the WinterCraft WP51 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 70% of Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (98%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP51 also have C wet ratings.
# | Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 | Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R13 - R15 | R13 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 Premium2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 | 41,6 | 28,5 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 42,5 | 30,2 | |||||
Show test details |