Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Firestone Roadhawk
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber summer tyres are slightly better rated (64%) than Firestone (54%). In this particular case, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 has a better rating of 82% compared to 72% of the Firestone Roadhawk. The first tyre test of Kleber Dynaxer HP4 was done in 2020, compared to 2018 when was the Firestone Roadhawk first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Dynaxer HP4 and the Roadhawk were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | Firestone Roadhawk | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Firestone Roadhawk 71 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 37,4 | 28,8 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 36,6 | 28,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 2,8 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,2 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 2,3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | 3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 31,6 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,7 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | |||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,3 | 2,9 | 2,5 | |||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Poor | 4,9 | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 61 | 56 | 20 | 8 | 18 | ||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 45 | 47 | 17 | 8 | 12 | ||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Conditionally recommended | 43 | 44 | 20 | 5 | 14 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||