Segment
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Premium2. Kormoran SNOW Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Vredestein winter tyres are slightly better rated (53%) than Kormoran (14%). In this particular case, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro has a better rating of 81% compared to 6% of the Kormoran SNOW. The first tyre test of Kormoran SNOW was done in 2021, compared to 2018 when was the Vredestein Wintrac Pro first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 225/45 R17 test, where both the SNOW and the Wintrac Pro were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Kormoran SNOW | Vredestein Wintrac Pro | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R17 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Premium2. Kormoran SNOW Lowcost
2. Kormoran SNOW 16.
2. Kormoran SNOW 38.
2. Kormoran SNOW 30.33
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Exemplary
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Recommended
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,0 | |||||
Kormoran SNOW Rating: Poor | 5,4 | 5,4 | |||||
Vredestein Wintrac Pro Rating: Satisfactory | 2,3 | 2,7 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
Kormoran Snow | 38,4 | ||||||
Vredestein Wintrac Pro | 36,9 | 26,3 | |||||
Show test details |