Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle2. Kormoran Snowpro b2 Lowcost
Comparison: Kormoran Snowpro b2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (48%) than Kormoran (14%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2015 185/60 R15 test, where both the Snowpro b2 and the WinterCraft WP51 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kormoran Snowpro b2 has E wet grip rating, whereas 98% of Kumho WinterCraft WP51 has C rating.
| # | Kormoran Snowpro b2 | Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | ||||||
| Kormoran Snowpro b2 | 48,6 | ||||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 42,5 | 30,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||