Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Upper-middle2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (54%) than Yokohama (31%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta HS51 has a better rating of 45% compared to 23% of the Yokohama Bluearth AE-50. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2019 235/45 R18 test, where both the Ecsta HS51 and the Bluearth AE-50 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Kumho Ecsta HS51 has B wet grip rating, whereas 67% of Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 has A rating. We also know where Ecsta HS51 is made - China.
# | Kumho Ecsta HS51 | Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R14 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Upper-middle2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Exemplary
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Satisfactory
2. Kumho Ecsta HS51 ? dB
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 277 | 142 | 135 | ||||
Kumho Ecsta HS51 | 181 | 73 | 108 | ||||
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 | 235 | 114 | 121 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
Kumho Ecsta HS51 | 38,6 | 29,4 | |||||
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 | 36,4 | 30,5 | |||||
Show test details |