• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (54%) than Yokohama (31%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta HS51 has a better rating of 45% compared to 23% of the Yokohama Bluearth AE-50. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2019 235/45 R18 test, where both the Ecsta HS51 and the Bluearth AE-50 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Kumho Ecsta HS51 has B wet grip rating, whereas 67% of Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 has A rating. We also know where Ecsta HS51 is made - China.

# Kumho Ecsta HS51
/45%
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
/23%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR14 - R18 R14 - R19
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name Points totalWetDry
Best values in test277142135
Kumho Ecsta HS5118173108
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50235114121
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,627
Kumho Ecsta HS5138,629,4
Yokohama Bluearth AE-5036,430,5
Show test details