Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle2. Premiorri Solazo Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Premiorri Solazo
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Premiorri). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (54%) than Premiorri (1%). The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta HS52 was done in 2022, compared to 2023 when was the Premiorri Solazo first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Ecsta HS52 and the Solazo were tested.
| # | Kumho Ecsta HS52 | Premiorri Solazo | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ? dB2. Premiorri Solazo ? dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,3 | |||||
| Premiorri Solazo Rating: Poor | 3,2 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||