Segment
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle2. BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
Table of contents:
| # | Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R14 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Our comparison today pits two all-round tyres against each other: the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S and the BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2. Created by Kumho and BFGoodrich respectively, these tyres were both tested end-to-end by Autobild.
The Kumho HA32 Solus 4S, manufactured in China, stands impressively with a score of 73% from our own assessment. It garnered a tenth place in both the general and 2020 Autobild tests - arguably a better result in a field that consisted of 32 tyres. Among its noted strengths are its excellent mileage, value for money, and exterior noise rating. Autobild's text summary further elaborates on these features, pointing out its good all-weather driving characteristics, good traction and short braking distances on snow, and dynamic wet and dry handling. Despite these strengths, it's worth noting its weaknesses, which include lower mileage, high rolling resistance, and a just satisfactory price-performance ratio.
In contrast, the BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2, unarguably the underdog in this comparison, obtained a lesser rating of 48% from our evaluation. This tyre ended up in the twelfth place in Autobild's ranking - a respectable position given the number of competitors. It stands out for its exterior noise, comfort, and snow performance, including braking, cornering, and handling. The text summary reflects these strong points as well: highlighting exceptional traction on ice and snow, short dry braking distances, good rolling comfort, and fuel-saving rolling resistance. Its main shortcoming is its understeering behavior on wet surfaces.
In conclusion, the choice between the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S and the BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 depends largely on the specific driving conditions and expectations. If higher mileage and less road noise are priorities, the Kumho Solus 4S could be a better choice. Conversely, if one often drives on ice, snow, or seeks comfort, the BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 shines brighter. However, both tyres are well-regarded within the allround segment, each offering a unique blend of features to cater to differing preferences.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 Highly recommended2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 41,5 | 54,4 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 | 42 | 55,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 2+ | 3 | |||
| BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 44,3 | 49,3 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 | 43,1 | 51 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||