Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle2. Tristar Ice-Plus S210 Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP51 vs. Tristar Ice-Plus S210
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Tristar). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (48%) than Tristar (1%). The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP51 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Tristar Ice-Plus S210 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the WinterCraft WP51 and the Ice-Plus S210 were tested. We also know where WinterCraft WP51 is made - Korea.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | Tristar Ice-Plus S210 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry driving behavior
Dry handling
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Ice lateral guidance
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | ||||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 41,0 | ||||||
| Tristar Ice-Plus S210 | 47,3 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||