Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle2. Laufenn I Fit LW31 Lowcost
Comparison: Laufenn I Fit LW31 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Laufenn (48%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR Snowproof has a better rating of 57% compared to 19% of the Laufenn I Fit LW31. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 195/65 R15 test, where both the I Fit LW31 and the WR Snowproof were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Laufenn I Fit LW31 | Nokian WR Snowproof | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory2. Laufenn I Fit LW31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory2. Laufenn I Fit LW31 Satisfactory
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof 69 dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,9 | 2,0 | 2,6 | 2,0 | |
| Laufenn I Fit LW31 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 2,6 | 1,9 | 2,0 | 2,9 | 3,0 | |
| Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 2,5 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,9 | 2,5 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | ||||||
| Laufenn I Fit LW31 | 39,4 | ||||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof | 32,2 | 24,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||