Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Premium2. Laufenn S Fit EQ Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (64%) than Laufenn (55%). In this particular case, the Michelin Primacy 4 has a better rating of 89% compared to 39% of the Laufenn S Fit EQ. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the S Fit EQ and the Primacy 4 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Laufenn S Fit EQ | Michelin Primacy 4 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R20 | ||
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Premium2. Laufenn S Fit EQ Lowcost
2. Laufenn S Fit EQ 17.5
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Highly recommended2. Laufenn S Fit EQ Satisfactory
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Recommended2. Laufenn S Fit EQ Satisfactory
1. Michelin Primacy 4 68 dB2. Laufenn S Fit EQ ? dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
Laufenn S Fit EQ Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2+ | 2- | ||||
Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 1- | 1- | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Running costs | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 157 | 68 | 54 | 22 | 20 | ||
Laufenn S Fit EQ Rating: Recommended | 146 | 55 | 52 | 19 | 20 | ||
Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Highly recommended | 151 | 63 | 53 | 22 | 13 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
Laufenn S Fit EQ Rating: Poor | 5,0 | 2,1 | 2,3 | 2,0 | 2,5 | ||
Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Recommended | 2,2 | 2,0 | 2,3 | 1,0 | 2,0 | ||
Show test details |