• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Michelin Latitude Tour HP vs. Nokian Line SUV

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (64%) than Nokian (58%). In this particular case, the Nokian Line SUV has a better rating of 46% compared to 17% of the Michelin Latitude Tour HP. The first tyre test of Michelin Latitude Tour HP was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Nokian Line SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2017 215/60 R17 test, where both the Latitude Tour HP and the Line SUV were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 69% of Michelin Latitude Tour HP has C wet grip rating, whereas 63% of Nokian Line SUV has A rating.

# Michelin Latitude Tour HP
/17%
Nokian Line SUV
/46%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR16 - R21 R15 - R19
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name Points totalWetDryRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test1534237146
Michelin Latitude Tour HP
Rating: Conditionally recommended
1245337 158
Nokian Line SUV
Rating: Recommended
141614414 7
Show test details
Name WetDryComfortFuel consumption
Best values in test2,01,62,81,5
Michelin Latitude Tour HP
Rating: Sufficient
3,92,33,11,9
Nokian Line SUV
Rating: Good
2,62,12,53,22,8
Show test details