Segment
1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 SUV Lowcost2. Tristar Ice-Plus S210 Lowcost
Comparison: Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 SUV vs. Tristar Ice-Plus S210
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Tristar). Generally, Nexen winter tyres are slightly better rated (43%) than Tristar (1%). But when it comes to comparing Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 SUV and Tristar Ice-Plus S210, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 SUV was done in 2019, compared to 2016 when was the Tristar Ice-Plus S210 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 215/60 R17 test, where both the WinGuard Sport 2 SUV and the Ice-Plus S210 were tested.
| # | Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 SUV | Tristar Ice-Plus S210 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 SUV Rating: Not recommended | 3 | 3+ | 1- | ||||
| Tristar Ice-Plus S210 Rating: Not recommended | 4+ | 2 | 3- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||