10 shops, 90 283 products

|

Comparison: Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). In this particular case, the Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 has a better rating of 63% compared to 35% of the Yokohama W.drive V905. The first tyre test of Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Yokohama W.drive V905 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 and the W.drive V905 were tested. See more mutual tests below.

#	Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 /63%	Yokohama W.drive V905 /35%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R15 - R20	R16 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 90

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

Number of tests

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 13x

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

Best position in test

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 7.

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

Worst position in test

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 27.

Average position in tests

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 12.85

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

Year of the last test

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 2023

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

Best rating in test

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Good

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Good

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Nexen
WinGuard Sport 2 WU7
77%

Yokohama
W.drive V905
73%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 ?

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Nexen
WinGuard Sport 2 WU7
83%

Yokohama
W.drive V905
78%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
W.drive V905
80%

Nexen
WinGuard Sport 2 WU7
79%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Nexen
WinGuard Sport 2 WU7
87%

Yokohama
W.drive V905
79%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 ? dB

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 ? dB

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
W.drive V905
83%

Nexen
WinGuard Sport 2 WU7
80%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	1-
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Rating: Good	2	2-	2	2
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Good	2-	2-	2-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	1-
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Rating: Good	2-	2	2	1-
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7	34	28,3
Yokohama W.drive V905	34,7	28,3
Show test details