Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Premium2. Nokian Weatherproof SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Weatherproof SUV vs. Vredestein Quatrac 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Vredestein allround tyres are slightly better rated (62%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Vredestein Quatrac 5 has a better rating of 36% compared to 19% of the Nokian Weatherproof SUV. The first tyre test of Nokian Weatherproof SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Vredestein Quatrac 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AutoMotorSport 2016 215/60 R17 test, where both the Weatherproof SUV and the Quatrac 5 were tested.
| # | Nokian Weatherproof SUV | Vredestein Quatrac 5 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow cornering
Snow handling
Snow traction
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 8,3 | 8,1 | 8,3 | 10 | 10 | ||
| Nokian Weatherproof SUV | 8,3 | 7,4 | 8,1 | 7 | 8 | ||
| Vredestein Quatrac 5 | 6,2 | 7,5 | 6,7 | 8 | 8 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||