Segment
1. Nokian Wetproof SUV Upper-middle2. Toyo Proxes Comfort Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Wetproof SUV vs. Toyo Proxes Comfort
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Toyo). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Toyo (47%). In this particular case, the Toyo Proxes Comfort has a better rating of 72% compared to 59% of the Nokian Wetproof SUV. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 215/60 R17 test, where both the Wetproof SUV and the Proxes Comfort were tested.
| # | Nokian Wetproof SUV | Toyo Proxes Comfort | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
2. Toyo Proxes Comfort Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Grass traction
Gravel traction
Mud traction
Sand traction
Handling on gravel
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian Wetproof SUV 71 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Nokian WetProof SUV Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2+ | ||||
| Toyo Proxes Comfort Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||