Segment
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle2. Wanli S1083 Snowgrip Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 3 vs. Wanli S1083 Snowgrip
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Wanli). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Wanli (1%). The first tyre test of Nokian WR SUV 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Wanli S1083 Snowgrip first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the WR SUV 3 and the S1083 Snowgrip were tested.
| # | Nokian WR SUV 3 | Wanli S1083 Snowgrip | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 ? dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 406 | 147 | 134 | 143 | |||
| Nokian WR SUV 3 Rating: Highly recommended | 390 | 131 | 128 | 131 | |||
| Wanli S1083 Snowgrip Rating: - | 316 | 59 | 134 | 123 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||