Segment
1. Norauto Prevensys 4 Lowcost2. Westlake Z-107 Lowcost
Comparison: Norauto Prevensys 4 vs. Westlake Z-107
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Norauto) against a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Westlake). Generally, Norauto summer tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Westlake (39%). In this particular case, the Norauto Prevensys 4 has a better rating of 75% compared to 37% of the Westlake Z-107. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Prevensys 4 and the Z-107 were tested.
| # | Norauto Prevensys 4 | Westlake Z-107 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | |||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Westlake Z-107 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
2. Westlake Z-107 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Westlake Z-107 ? dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Norauto Prevensys 4 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 3,2 | |||||
| Westlake Z-107 Rating: Sufficient | 3,7 | 2,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||