Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Toyo (47%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 has a better rating of 89% compared to 34% of the Toyo Proxes CF2. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Proxes CF2 and the Turanza T005 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Toyo Proxes CF2 | Bridgestone Turanza T005 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Toyo Proxes CF2 17.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Toyo Proxes CF2 ? dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 | ||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 2,3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 | 37,8 | 40,5 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,7 | 34,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||