Segment
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle2. Nokian Line Upper-middle
Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Nokian Line
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Toyo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Toyo (47%). In this particular case, the Nokian Line has a better rating of 35% compared to 34% of the Toyo Proxes CF2. The first tyre test of Toyo Proxes CF2 was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Nokian Line first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Proxes CF2 and the Line were tested.
| # | Toyo Proxes CF2 | Nokian Line | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian Line 17.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian Line 12.172. Toyo Proxes CF2 17.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian Line 72%
Wet handling
1. Nokian Line 80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet braking
2. Nokian Line 84%
Wet circle cornering
1. Nokian Line 87%
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian Line 72%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 ? dB2. Nokian Line ? dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Nokian Line 63%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 | 37,8 | 40,5 | |||||
| Nokian Line | 37,5 | 38 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||