In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Debica (67%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 has a better rating of 91% compared to 47% of the Debica Presto UHP2. The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP2 was done in 2022, compared to 2018 when was the Bridgestone Turanza T005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Presto UHP2 and the Turanza T005 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Debica Presto UHP2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (76%) of the Bridgestone Turanza T005 also have A wet ratings.
# | Debica Presto UHP2
| Bridgestone Turanza T005
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R18 | R14 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
Debica Presto UHP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 3+ | ||||
Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 1 | 2+ | 2- | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
Debica Presto UHP2 | 36,5 | 29,8 | |||||
Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,8 | 27,5 | |||||
Show test details |