In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Switzerland (Esa-Tecar) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear). Generally, Goodyear winter tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Esa-Tecar (55%). But when it comes to comparing Esa-Tecar Super Grip 9 and Goodyear UltraGrip 9, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Esa-Tecar Super Grip 9 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Goodyear UltraGrip 9 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 175/65 R14 test, where both the Super Grip 9 and the UltraGrip 9 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Esa-Tecar Super Grip 9
| Goodyear UltraGrip 9
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R16 | ||
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 68 dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,7 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
Esa-Tecar Super Grip 9 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,5 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 3,3 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 1,5 | 1,8 |
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,7 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 3,0 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
Esa-Tecar Super Grip 9 Rating: Good | 2,3 | 2,3 | 2,3 | 2,1 | 3,3 | 2,5 | 1,7 |
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: Satisfactory | 1,9 | 2,4 | 2,7 | 2,4 | 3,1 | 2,0 | 2,1 |
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,9 | 1,7 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 1 | 1,5 |
Esa-Tecar Super Grip 9 Rating: - | 2,8 | 2,4 | 2,1 | 2,8 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 1,7 |
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: - | 2,2 | 2,5 | 1,8 | 2,5 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 1,5 |
Show test details |