In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, GoodYear allround tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Bridgestone (67%). In this particular case, the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 has a better rating of 94% compared to 75% of the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 225/50 R18 test, where both the Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 and the Weather Control A005 EVO were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 96% of GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 has B wet grip rating, whereas 98% of Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO has A rating.
# | GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R15 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Exemplary2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Very good
2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 1- | ||||
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1- | ||||
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2- | 2+ | ||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Rating: Very good | |||||||
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Rating: Good + | |||||||
Show test details |